Don't Like Islamic Terrorism? Blame a Liberal.
Since liberals are so blinded by their disdain for America, they have been unable to recognize their own culpability in Islam's war against the West.
Before the smoke settled and the blood dried in London, the latest front in the world war against Islamofascism, brain-addled liberals were once again projecting the blame to America. The terrorists would stop trying to kill us, they say, if only we would abandon our military bases in Muslim nations, or jettison the Israeli democracy in favor of a Palestinian theocracy, or waste millions of dollars down another African Islamic rat-hole, or stop flushing Korans down the prison commode, or other such tiresome nonsense. Of course, anyone with a semblance of historical perspective or reason knows that Islam will not alter its destructive course until the world is crushed beneath the weight of a vindictive Allah. All you have to do is listen to their own words, and read their own history. But proving once again that liberalism, like Islam, is a mental disorder, America's most strident objectors and Islam's most vocal defenders, usually social libertines who make both a hobby and a career out of bashing this country for any reason, are apparently unaware that they would be murdered first under such a regime.
There are certainly reasons for Islam's declared battle against America, most fundamentally originating in Islam's perception of Western societies as decadent and godless, and the root cause of Islam's inferior position around the world. While there may have been a time, a thousand years or more ago, when Islamic culture somewhat resembled civilization, those days are long past, and what remains are substantially illiterate Moslems eeking out a subsistence living. Neutered and weak, Islam's failure to thrive is juxtaposed in sharp contrast to the West's Judeo-Christian success and hegemony. The absence of global, tangibly positive contributions from nearly a billion Islamic followers is staggering in its implications.
This is understandably difficult for Moslems to explain, since Islam dismisses Christianity and Judaism, the very basis for previous Western success, as inferior and unenlightened religions, and which views itself as the final word of God. Since God can't be wrong, there must be another explanation. If it wasn't for those Satanic Christians and Jews, the reasoning goes, Moslems would be living in comfort and ease, instead of languishing embarrassingly in some of the most crushing ignorance and destitute poverty the world has ever seen. Everywhere Moslems look, their religion and culture has proven a dismal failure. Islamic jealousy and self-hatred is evident and acute, and manifested in its dark worship of death and the malleability and willingness of young men and women to blow themselves to pieces in order to be seen as worthy in the eyes of Allah.
But beyond evident feelings of inferiority, other equally strange and sinister internal struggles seem to compel the Islamic fundamentalists. By subjugating women with humiliating strictures, and reacting violently to any female autonomy, Moslems men seem to live in perpetual fear of women, and their own lack of masculinity. While publicly denouncing homosexuals as sinful and decadent, it is well known that homosexual behavior is prevalent in the Islamic world. It was long-rumored that Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat enjoyed an active, and barely hidden, homosexual sex life, preferring young boys and men. In fact, Supreme Leader of Iran Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the founding father of Islamic fundamentalism, openly legitimized specific homosexual acts. In the book "The Sayings of Ayatollah Khomeini: Political, Philosophical, Social and Religious (The Little Green Book, ISBN 0-553-14032-9), a well-documented compilation of his speeches and writings, he is quoted as saying "if a man sodomizes the son, brother or father of his wife, the marriage remains valid". Also, sex with children and animals does not appear to be outside of normal Moslem sexual behavior. Khomeini writes in his book "Tahririlvasyleh" (volume four, Darol Elm, Qom, Iran 1990) that "a man can have sexual pleasure from a child as young as a baby. . . sodomizing is acceptable". He further states that "a man can have sex with animals such as sheep, cows, camels and so on". Both of these books are widely distributed in Iran, the birthplace of modern Islamic terrorism.
Ironically, much of what the left has supported and promoted, such as gender rights, homosexual rights, animal rights, abortion, pornography, drug use, and secular humanism are now cited by Islamic scholars to justify Islam's war against the West, and America in particular. In fact, it would have been nearly impossible to use such justifications fifty years ago, but with the successful incremental introduction of liberal thought into our own culture, such philosophy is common, prevalent and nearly mainstream. While liberals would argue that these societal changes are signs of enlightenment, and others would view these issues simply as the dispassionate advance of civil liberties, Moslem religious leaders will continue to exploit this dichotomy which allows such apparent godlessness to thrive in the greatest nation the world has ever produced.
While only the murderous, crazed Islamofascists are ultimately responsible for acts of terror, liberalism has given the terrorists another convenient excuse to hate America.
Before the smoke settled and the blood dried in London, the latest front in the world war against Islamofascism, brain-addled liberals were once again projecting the blame to America. The terrorists would stop trying to kill us, they say, if only we would abandon our military bases in Muslim nations, or jettison the Israeli democracy in favor of a Palestinian theocracy, or waste millions of dollars down another African Islamic rat-hole, or stop flushing Korans down the prison commode, or other such tiresome nonsense. Of course, anyone with a semblance of historical perspective or reason knows that Islam will not alter its destructive course until the world is crushed beneath the weight of a vindictive Allah. All you have to do is listen to their own words, and read their own history. But proving once again that liberalism, like Islam, is a mental disorder, America's most strident objectors and Islam's most vocal defenders, usually social libertines who make both a hobby and a career out of bashing this country for any reason, are apparently unaware that they would be murdered first under such a regime.
There are certainly reasons for Islam's declared battle against America, most fundamentally originating in Islam's perception of Western societies as decadent and godless, and the root cause of Islam's inferior position around the world. While there may have been a time, a thousand years or more ago, when Islamic culture somewhat resembled civilization, those days are long past, and what remains are substantially illiterate Moslems eeking out a subsistence living. Neutered and weak, Islam's failure to thrive is juxtaposed in sharp contrast to the West's Judeo-Christian success and hegemony. The absence of global, tangibly positive contributions from nearly a billion Islamic followers is staggering in its implications.
This is understandably difficult for Moslems to explain, since Islam dismisses Christianity and Judaism, the very basis for previous Western success, as inferior and unenlightened religions, and which views itself as the final word of God. Since God can't be wrong, there must be another explanation. If it wasn't for those Satanic Christians and Jews, the reasoning goes, Moslems would be living in comfort and ease, instead of languishing embarrassingly in some of the most crushing ignorance and destitute poverty the world has ever seen. Everywhere Moslems look, their religion and culture has proven a dismal failure. Islamic jealousy and self-hatred is evident and acute, and manifested in its dark worship of death and the malleability and willingness of young men and women to blow themselves to pieces in order to be seen as worthy in the eyes of Allah.
But beyond evident feelings of inferiority, other equally strange and sinister internal struggles seem to compel the Islamic fundamentalists. By subjugating women with humiliating strictures, and reacting violently to any female autonomy, Moslems men seem to live in perpetual fear of women, and their own lack of masculinity. While publicly denouncing homosexuals as sinful and decadent, it is well known that homosexual behavior is prevalent in the Islamic world. It was long-rumored that Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat enjoyed an active, and barely hidden, homosexual sex life, preferring young boys and men. In fact, Supreme Leader of Iran Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the founding father of Islamic fundamentalism, openly legitimized specific homosexual acts. In the book "The Sayings of Ayatollah Khomeini: Political, Philosophical, Social and Religious (The Little Green Book, ISBN 0-553-14032-9), a well-documented compilation of his speeches and writings, he is quoted as saying "if a man sodomizes the son, brother or father of his wife, the marriage remains valid". Also, sex with children and animals does not appear to be outside of normal Moslem sexual behavior. Khomeini writes in his book "Tahririlvasyleh" (volume four, Darol Elm, Qom, Iran 1990) that "a man can have sexual pleasure from a child as young as a baby. . . sodomizing is acceptable". He further states that "a man can have sex with animals such as sheep, cows, camels and so on". Both of these books are widely distributed in Iran, the birthplace of modern Islamic terrorism.
Ironically, much of what the left has supported and promoted, such as gender rights, homosexual rights, animal rights, abortion, pornography, drug use, and secular humanism are now cited by Islamic scholars to justify Islam's war against the West, and America in particular. In fact, it would have been nearly impossible to use such justifications fifty years ago, but with the successful incremental introduction of liberal thought into our own culture, such philosophy is common, prevalent and nearly mainstream. While liberals would argue that these societal changes are signs of enlightenment, and others would view these issues simply as the dispassionate advance of civil liberties, Moslem religious leaders will continue to exploit this dichotomy which allows such apparent godlessness to thrive in the greatest nation the world has ever produced.
While only the murderous, crazed Islamofascists are ultimately responsible for acts of terror, liberalism has given the terrorists another convenient excuse to hate America.
posted by Mark Outland at 12:24 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home